If not a salary cap, how does Mr. Rayner suggest w...

Published February 19, 2009, 3:17 p.m. EST

Updated February 19, 2009, 8:05 p.m. EST

1 Min Read

If not a salary cap, how does Mr. Rayner suggest we hold accountable the execs of companies that are using tax payer money to bail them out? Mr. Rayner's argument might have some legitimacy, but does he have a better answer?

Processing Content

MORE FROM EMPLOYEE BENEFIT NEWS

Professional development

At CVS, education benefits strengthen talent pipelines

Development opportunities help employees pursue career paths and apply new skills that align with essential company roles.

By Lee Hafner
Editor

1h ago
Benefits Think The hidden cost of healthcare: When affording care means putting life on hold

Employees are putting off major life decisions like buying a house and expanding their family as daily financial challenges grow.

3h ago

Teira Gunlock
Benefits Think The case for asking about benefits in exit interviews

If benefits aren't showing up in exit interviews, don't assume they're not a factor – assume you're not asking the right questions.

3h ago

Kate McKinnon

Kate McKinnon HR Solutions, LLC
Healthcare

Rising health costs push employers to rethink benefits strategies

As healthcare costs continue climbing, employers are exploring new funding models, cost-containment strategies, and benefits approaches to better manage spending.

By Jimmy Nesbitt
Reporter

July 15
Benefits Think The pros and cons of a PEP for larger employers

What larger retirement plan sponsors stand to gain and give up in a pooled employer plan created under the SECURE Act of 2019.

July 15

Jay Schmitt

Strategic Benefits Advisors
Employee retention

The benefits that retain high performers, part 1

From flexibility to promotions to pet insurance, personalized perks and performance recognition incentivize top employees to give their best at work.

By Lee Hafner
Editor

July 15