25 worst cities for retirement

WalletHub, an online personal finance site, researched the
Four key dimensions were measured: affordability (including taxpayer-friendliness and adjusted cost of living); activities (theaters per capita and recreation-friendliness); quality of life (including age-friendly community and mild weather) and healthcare (including care facilities per capita and suicide rate for elders). Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the most favorable conditions for retirement.
Here are the 25 worst cities for retirement, based on WalletHub’s research. (
25. Detroit

Affordability rank: 94
Activities rank: 86
Quality of life rank: 178
Healthcare rank: 148
24. Oceanside, California

Affordability rank: 152
Activities rank: 127
Quality of life rank: 24
Healthcare rank: 106
23. Yonkers, New York

Affordability rank: 180
Activities rank: 43
Quality of life rank: 61
Healthcare rank: 64
22. Burlington, Vermont

Affordability rank: 176
Activities rank: 52
Quality of life rank: 129
Healthcare rank: 16
21. Fort Wayne, Indiana

Affordability rank: 89
Activities rank: 160
Quality of life rank: 146
Healthcare rank: 138
20. Chula Vista, California

Affordability rank: 152
Activities rank: 165
Quality of life rank: 18
Healthcare rank: 102
19. Fort Smith, Arkansas

Affordability rank: 42
Activities rank: 168
Quality of life rank: 168
Healthcare rank: 169
18. Oxnard, California

Affordability rank: 138
Activities rank: 164
Quality of life rank: 66
Healthcare rank: 145
17. Fontana, California

Affordability rank: 126
Activities rank: 167
Quality of life rank: 123
Healthcare rank: 156
16. Rancho Cucamonga, California

Affordability rank: 140
Activities rank: 146
Quality of life rank: 90
Healthcare rank: 137
15. Riverside, California

Affordability rank: 124
Activities rank: 162
Quality of life rank: 116
Healthcare rank: 127
14. San Bernardino, California

Affordability rank: 99
Activities rank: 115
Quality of life rank: 174
Healthcare rank: 162
13. Worcester, Massachusetts

Affordability rank: 141
Activities rank: 116
Quality of life rank: 162
Healthcare rank: 87
12. Wichita, Kansas

Affordability rank: 125
Activities rank: 136
Quality of life rank: 169
Healthcare rank: 130
11. New Haven, Connecticut

Affordability rank: 163
Activities rank: 74
Quality of life rank: 154
Healthcare rank: 83
10. Fresno, California

Affordability rank: 98
Activities rank: 177
Quality of life rank: 144
Healthcare rank: 151
9. Modesto, California

Affordability rank: 104
Activities rank: 182
Quality of life rank: 132
Healthcare rank: 168
8. Jersey City, New Jersey

Affordability rank: 175
Activities rank: 102
Quality of life rank: 60
Healthcare rank: 120
7. Bakersfield, California

Affordability rank: 96
Activities rank: 178
Quality of life rank: 131
Healthcare rank: 182
6. Providence, Rhode Island

Affordability rank: 168
Activities rank: 53
Quality of life rank: 177
Healthcare rank: 150
5. Stockton, California

Affordability rank: 112
Activities rank: 179
Quality of life rank: 166
Healthcare rank: 174
4. Baltimore

Affordability rank: 148
Activities rank: 66
Quality of life rank: 182
Healthcare rank: 163
3. Warwick, Rhode Island

Affordability rank: 168
Activities rank: 123
Quality of life rank: 159
Healthcare rank: 152
2. Bridgeport, Connecticut

Affordability rank: 181
Activities rank: 151
Quality of life rank: 133
Healthcare rank: 88
1. Newark, New Jersey

Affordability rank: 174
Activities rank: 78
Quality of life rank: 172
Healthcare rank: 171