Benefits Think AI in employment decisions: Critical questions emerging from the Workday and Meta cases

Published 5 Min Read

Man with head on arms, box packed with desk items, fired, laid off
Adobe Stock

As employers increasingly incorporate artificial intelligence into hiring, workforce planning, performance management, and ADA and FMLA decision-making, two high-profile lawsuits are helping define the legal risks ahead: Mobley v. Workday and DOE 1, et al., v. Meta.

While the facts differ, both cases raise questions that should be familiar to every employer managing disability, leave and accommodation issues. Much of the public discussion has focused on whether AI “made” the employment decision. That is certainly important. But from an ADA and FMLA perspective, a second question may be equally significant: Were the data, rankings, and decision criteria feeding the AI system designed in a way that properly accounted for disability-related absences, protected leave, accommodations, and other employee rights?

Alec Herring
Alec Herring, area SVP and employee benefits and absence and productivity consultant with Gallagher

Alec Herring, JD, CLU, CLMS, is an area SVP and employee benefits and absence and productivity consultant with Gallagher. He advises large employers on leave of absence, disability, accommodation, … Read full bio


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Employee Benefit News

Sign Up Form

Login Modal Form