Benefits Think

How to best bolster retirement readiness 

Laptop, documents and finance with a senior couple busy on a budget review in the home together. Accounting, taxes or investment planning with a mature man and woman looking at insurance or savings.
Adobe Stock

Let me tell you about a quiet disaster that's unfolding across your clients' 401(k) statements. For decades, we've told employees a simple story: save consistently, invest wisely, retire comfortably. It's a beautiful narrative. It's also incomplete in a way that's about to cost a lot of people a lot more than they realize. 

Processing Content

The piece we left out of the story is longevity — specifically, the kind of longevity that comes with frailty, care needs and the slow erosion of independence. 

We built a retirement system designed to fund a certain number of years of healthy living. Then people started living longer. Then they started needing care for longer. And the system never caught up. So now you have millions of Americans who have done everything right — maxed out contributions, avoided early withdrawals, maybe even hired a financial adviser — who are going to discover that their retirement savings were optimized for the wrong problem. 

They planned for 20 years of golf and travel. They're going to get 20 years of home care and assisted-living bills. 

The math is brutal and nobody talks about it. Let's walk through it. Today, a home health aide in most markets runs $30 to $40 an hour. A decent assisted-living facility is $5,000 to $8,000 a month. Skilled nursing can easily exceed $120,000 a year. Those numbers aren't hypotheticals. They're what your clients' employees are paying right now for aging parents, spouses with dementia, siblings with disabilities. 

Now ask yourself: what does a $500,000 401(k) balance do against that? Even a well-funded account gets eaten alive in a few years if care is needed. And most employees don't have that much saved. The average 401(k) balance for people nearing retirement is a fraction of what would be needed to cover just a few years of intensive care. 

So where does the money come from? That's the question nobody wants to answer until it's too late. Some families burn through savings and then rely on children to fill the gap — which is a plan, but not one most parents would choose if they thought about it. Others turn to Medicaid, which requires spending down almost everything and then accepting whatever facility has an open bed. Others piece together a patchwork of home care funded by home equity, credit cards or loans from family. 

What you almost never see is a plan. A real plan, made in advance, that says: "This is how we'll pay for care. This is where we want to receive it. This is how we'll protect the healthy spouse and the kids." Because the retirement system we built wasn't designed to answer those questions. 

That's where you come in. Your clients — the HR leaders who rely on you — don't need another retirement plan vendor. They need someone to help them see the gap between what they're offering and what their employees actually face. They need to understand that the retirement-readiness numbers they're looking at are probably measuring the wrong thing. And they need practical, human ways to help employees bridge that gap without turning their benefits team into long-term care (LTC) insurance salespeople. 

You don't have to become an LTC expert to start this conversation. You just have to be willing to ask a different question. Instead of "How much are employees saving?" start asking "How would an employee's retirement plan hold up if they needed three years of care starting at age 75?" 

Instead of assuming that longevity is a good-news story, acknowledge that extended longevity without a plan is a financial and emotional time bomb. Then start pointing toward solutions — not just products, but a way of thinking. 

Some of that is financial architecture: hybrid life/LTC products that protect assets while providing a care benefit. Some of it is legal and logistical: powers of attorney, care directives, family conversations. Some of it is cultural: making it okay for employees to say "I'm planning for the possibility that I won't be independent forever" without feeling like they're admitting defeat. 

This broader approach has a name: future independence planning. It's not about selling one thing. It's about giving people a framework to stay in control of their lives, their choices and their legacies — no matter what their health does. 

It starts with the retirement savings employees already have and expands the lens to include the risks those savings were never designed to cover. Done well, it becomes the most important conversation a benefit adviser can have. 

The 401(k) system did a lot of good. It forced us to save. It gave millions a shot at dignity in their later years. But it was never built to handle the care crisis we're living through now. Employers that figure out how to supplement it — with planning, products and honest conversation with their adviser — are going to retain their best people when the hard years come. The rest are going to keep watching good employees leave, blindsided by the discovery that their retirement plan was missing the most important chapter. 

You already know which kind of adviser you want to be. Now go start the conversation that proves it! 


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Retirement Financial wellness
MORE FROM EMPLOYEE BENEFIT NEWS
Load More