Benefits Think When ‘shared savings’ really means shared conflicts

Published Updated 4 Min Read

Two employees talking in office
Adobe Stock

It’s tempting to breeze through contract execution during another busy renewal season, but pausing to truly review the contractual language could save group health plan sponsors and participants significant financial and legal headaches.

A recent case, Tiara Yachts, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, serves as a powerful reminder: what’s in your client’s contract matters. Seemingly harmless terms like “shared savings” may sound like smart cost-containment strategies, but in practice, they often mask hidden conflicts of interest that can drain plan assets and expose fiduciaries to risk.

Jamie Greenleaf
Co-founder

Jamie Greenleaf is a Fiduciary Consultant and Principal of Greenleaf Advisors, as well as Co-Founder of Fiduciary In A Box


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Employee Benefit News

Sign Up Form

Login Modal Form