Choosing between all-inclusive or circumstantial leave policies
With more and more jurisdictions on local and state levels enacting paid sick leave laws, and likely more to come, a frequent question from affected employers is whether it is preferable to have separate vacation/personal leave and paid sick leave policies or an all-inclusive paid time off policy. There is no right or wrong answer to the question. Instead, many factors should be considered such as the size and structure of the company, the number of locations in places requiring paid sick leave, the industry norms for the amount and type of expected paid leave (i.e. what the competition is paying), and state laws on how paid leave is administered, among other factors.
To further evaluate whether to have a single PTO policy or separate policies for vacation, personal days and sick leave, below are some of the pros and cons of each.
Payout of leave upon termination
Many states, including Illinois, require employers to pay out earned but unused vacation upon termination, regardless of any company policy or practice. Paid sick leave and other wage laws generally do not require payout of sick leave upon termination, unless the company policy requires it.
Therefore, if sick leave is combined into PTO, all unused time must be paid out upon termination. If the leaves are kept separate, this reduces the amount payable upon termination to only the unused vacation or personal time.
Carryover of accrued leave
Most state wage laws, including Illinois, allow employers to prohibit carryover of unused vacation time, as long as the employee has a reasonable period of time in which to use it.
Most paid sick leave laws, however, provide that an employee must be allowed at least some carryover of sick leave into the new accrual year. Therefore, with a combined PTO policy, the employer will have to allow carryover consistent with paid sick leave laws, which necessarily includes the carryover of some vacation and personal leave as well.
The carried over time will also come at a higher cost if the employee receives a raise before taking the carried over time off, or at termination. This might also encourage employees to try and save time in one year knowing that when they take the carried over leave the next year, it will be worth more.
With separate leave policies, an employer can limit the time that can be carried over to only sick leave, which will also limit how much unused leave must be paid out upon termination and at what rate.
Tracking of leave
Whether it is easier to track combined or separate leave policies will vary from company to company. Some employers are set up electronically to track hours worked and leave taken, and some are still tracking manually.
With separate leave policies, an employer can easily determine how much vacation an employee has taken and what vacation will carry over, or not to the next year. Tracking paid sick leave can be a bit more challenging since an employer must determine whether the reason for the leave qualifies under either its policy or applicable laws.
Since paid sick leave laws specify how much leave can be carried from one year to the next, however, the tracking should theoretically be reasonable. On the other hand, some employers may find it easier to track combined leave because they only have to track one set of available leave hours, and do not have to determine the purpose of leave being taken, or evaluate the validity of the excuse if it is for something medically-related.
As a further tracking benefit, companies with locations in multiple jurisdictions (some that require paid sick leave and some that do not) can have the same policy for all employees, as long as it meets the minimum of the strictest jurisdiction in terms of paid sick leave and other administrative matters relating to other forms of leave.
Also see: “Nine in 10 Americans make this 401(k) mistake”
How and when leave is earned
Paid sick leave required by law is frequently earned by the number of hours worked, as opposed to vacation and personal leave, which is more commonly earned by the employee’s length of service.
Although many companies do not provide vacation and other personal leave to part time or temporary employees, most of the current paid sick leave laws apply to part time and temporary employees.
With a combined PTO policy, this may require employers to provide vacation or other personal leave to part-time employees, even when not desired. The employer could draft separate leave policies, one for full- time employees providing PTO, and one for part time or temporary employees that minimally complies with state or local laws on paid sick leave.
Because avoiding providing part time or temporary workers paid vacation would require separate written policies, employers would lose the benefit of having only one policy for all employees.
Waiting periods for accruing and using leave
Most jurisdictions that regulate vacation time allow employers to require employees to work a certain length of time (perhaps six months or a year) before they begin to accrue and/or use vacation or personal leave. On the other hand, many paid sick leave laws, such as in Chicago and Cook County; require accrual to begin immediately upon hire (though some do allow a waiting period for an employee to begin taking paid sick leave — 180 days in Chicago and Cook County).
With a combined PTO policy, employers in jurisdictions that require paid sick leave to accrue upon hire will not be able to require a waiting period for accrual, and the waiting period for accrual and use of vacation and personal time will need to be consistent with applicable paid sick leave accrual and use laws. This would potentially also lead to having to pay out more accrued but unused leave upon termination.
Flexibility and morale
PTO policies allow for more flexibility to employees on how to use their time off. An employee who does not often get sick can take more vacation, while an employee with a large family to care for will have a better opportunity to receive pay while attending to family medical issues.
PTO policies may also improve employee morale in terms of allowing this additional flexibility in how leave is used, without having to justify the reason for the use. Employees can be encouraged to use all of their PTO time to avoid burnout, while it would not be possible to encourage employees to use all their paid sick leave if they do not actually need it for one of the reasons allowed in the various laws or by company policy.
Combined PTO policies also have the potential to reduce resentment among other employees towards those they perceive to be abusing their paid sick leave, and also to eliminate the need to lie about the reason for the leave.
For an employee to use paid sick leave, he or she must divulge to the employer the reason for the leave, at least a bare minimum so that the employer can determine whether the sick leave is being used appropriately either under the company’s policy or relevant law.
With a combined PTO policy, in which it does not matter the reason for the time off, an employee can keep private medical issues private and will not have to divulge details to the employer.
Not having to divulge the reason for the absence may also encourage more sick employees to actually stay home rather than fearing reprisal for taking time off and also potentially getting others sick at the same time.
On the other hand, it may be argued that having a combined leave policy might encourage sick employees to go to work so that they can save days to take a longer vacation.
This would not ultimately affect the total payout, but it could cause inconvenience for a longer vacation absence. Companies can separately institute limits of the amount of vacation that can be taken at one time to alleviate these concerns.
Employers’ bottom line
There are many good reasons for separate or combined leave policies. Because every company is different, and states and local municipalities may have laws pertaining to various types of leaves, it is important for each company to evaluate its own needs, using some of the above considerations as a starting point.