Benefits Think SCOTUS sides with Wal-Mart: Boon to business, blow to working women or both?

Published 2 Min Read

By now, you’ve likely heard that today, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court has ruled that a sex discrimination lawsuit waged on behalf of some 1.6 million women against Wal-Mart Inc. may not proceed as a class action, potentially saving the nation’s largest private employer billions in damages.

Additionally, the Court ruled (5-4) that in class action suits against employers, there needs to be “some glue holding together the alleged reasons for” the suit, with Justice Antonin Scalia adding in the majority opinion that such common threads were “entirely absent” in the Wal-Mart suit.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Employee Benefit News

VSP discontinues coverage for popular frames

In 1998, Aspex Eyewear, an eyewear designer that also develops frame technology, was in talks with Altair Eyewear, Inc., another frame designer, about potentially licensing a clip-on technology. Aspex alleges Altair sent the frames to China to make copies and then came out with a very similar clip-on frame. On August 5, 2002, Aspex filed suit for patent infringement.

Lisa V. Gillespie
By Lisa V. Gillespie
Writer

Court grants preliminary approval to settlement of  Wal‐Mart 401(k) fee lawsuit

On December 5, 2011, the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri granted preliminary approval to a proposed settlement of the Wal‐Mart 401(k) fee lawsuit (Braden v. Wal‐Mart Stores, Inc.). Under the proposed settlement, the defendants will pay a total of $13,500,000. The settlement also describes several potential changes to the plan's investment options, investment education programs and participant disclosures. …

Sign Up Form

Login Modal Form