The Employee Retirement Income Security Act generally requires that plan participants get copies of summary plan descriptions, plan documents and annual reports when requested. ERISA Section 104(b)(4) provides that the administrator shall, upon written request of any participant or beneficiary, furnish a copy of the latest updated summary, plan description, and the latest annual report, any terminal report, the bargaining agreement, trust agreement, contract, or other instruments under which the plan is established or operated.
There is even an enforcement provision that subjects the administrator to penalties if they fail to provide requested documentation. ERISA Section 502(c)(1) establishes that an administrator who fails to respond to a participants request for certain plan materials within 30 days could be subject to penalties of up to $110 per day for each day past the 30-day response time if the documents are not provided.
For administrators, this obligation can even apply if the participant is not specific in their request for documentation. Such was the case in Cultrona v. Nationwide Life Insurance Company, a recent case out of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Cultrona filed suit against Nationwide Life Insurance Company after an accidental death claim for her late husband was denied. During the appeal process, her counsel wrote a letter to the plan administrator requesting all documents comprising the administrative record and/or supporting Nationwides decision. Oddly, the administrator did not provide a copy of the actual accidental death policy for almost seven months.
The district court awarded $8,910 in statutory penalties to her because of the delay ($55 a day) and the administrator appealed. The administrator argued that the penalty was not warranted because she did not specifically request the document. It claimed that clear-notice should be applied, requiring participants to provide clear notice to the plan administrator of the information or documentation they desired. While the Court agreed with the administrator that clear-notice was the standard to apply, it found that the administrator should have known from the request that they were being asked for a copy of the policy. Since it was clear that the policy would have to have been part of the review, it was clear it was being requested. Then the court upheld the penalties.
For plan administrators, clear notice can be a tricky standard to try to sort out. Plan administrators should consider that ERISA clearly favors the production of documents when requested and recognize that a poorly worded request could still be enough of a request to warrant penalties. A simple solution is for administrators to avoid being accused of hiding plan documents. When responding to a request, give them what they ask for, and maybe even more (like what is required under 104(b)(4)). And if you have questions about how to respond to a request for documentation, ask for guidance from your professionals. Thats what we are here for.
Keith R. McMurdy is partner with Fox Rothschild. He focuses primarily on labor and employment issues arising from the design, drafting and administration of employee benefits plans. McMurdy also contributes to the firms Employee Benefits Legal Blog. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 212.878.7919.
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Employee Benefit News becomes archived within a week of it being published
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access