The 114th Congress is expected to tackle a number of issues that could have major implications for employers and alter strategies organizations currently use to communicate and manage benefits, including overtime rules under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the National Labor Relations Board’s ambush election rules and compensation equity.

Speaking at the Society for Human Resource Management’s Employment Law & Legislative Conference in Washington, D.C., this week, Hank Jackson, SHRM’s CEO, and Michael Aitken, SHRM’s vice president of government affairs, offered insight into what the organization is expecting to happen down the road.

“Washington needs an HR perspective,” said Jackson, during the event’s opening keynote session.

Also see: Cadillac tax, wellness program clarity top employer priorities

A little over a year ago, President Barack Obama issued a memorandum to the Department of Labor directing the agency to “modernize” and “simplify” the FLSA’s Section 541 rules, which govern overtime. One of SHRM’s concerns is that a substantial number of employees, who are now classified as exempt from overtime requirements, would become subject to overtime requirements.

“Certain industries and geographic locations can be hit hard,” said Aitken of the potential changes, pointing in particular to the South and Northwestern U.S.

In a poll taken during the presentation, an overwhelming majority of the employers said changes to exempt versus non-exempt statuses could lower employee morale, as well as weaken workplace autonomy.

Also see: House passes bill to amend ACA definition of full-time employee

The Affordable Care Act also remains on SHRM’s radar, as a number of events could change employer health care strategies.

For example, in the highly anticipated King v. Burwell, if the Supreme Court strikes down state subsidies, premiums could spike by as much as 600% overnight, Aitken said.

And while a successful repeal of the ACA is unlikely, even with the new congressional makeup, there are still several changes the current Congress will pursue, he added, including the ACA’s definition of full-time employee, the application of the excise tax and protections for employer wellness programs.

Also see: How King v. Burwell could shake out for employers

Register or login for access to this item and much more

All Employee Benefit News becomes archived within a week of it being published

Community members receive:
  • All recent and archived articles
  • Conference offers and updates
  • A full menu of enewsletter options
  • Web seminars, white papers, ebooks

Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access