Benefits Think

Transamerica exec slams working indefinitely as retirement strategy

You don’t have to be an expert pollster or retirement planning professional to know that American workers are delaying retirement for a variety of reasons. It’s also not too surprising to learn that a larger group of workers plan to not retire at all, as Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies recently revealed in a new poll.

Processing Content

However, what made me do a double take is that Transamerica officials view employees’ non-retiring retirement strategy as a bad thing.

According to the center’s survey, 39% of respondents plan to retire after age 70 or not at all, and more than half (54%) plan to work in retirement.

To each his own, I say, but Catherine Collinson, president of the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, disagrees.

“With all of life’s uncertainties, planning not to retire is simply not a viable retirement strategy,” she says. “Planning to work past age 65 is an important opportunity to continue earning income, save more, and help to alleviate a retirement savings shortfall; however, it’s important that workers be proactive in setting a retirement savings goal, saving and investing for retirement, and having a backup plan if they are forced to retire sooner than expected.”

Of course, it’s important to have a safety net in any financial situation. But I think it's unfair to say that an employee who decides, “You know what? I’m just not going to retire.” is making a poor choice.

What do you think? Are there negative consequences for employees who opt to keep working indefinitely rather than retire? Share your thoughts in the comments.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
MORE FROM EMPLOYEE BENEFIT NEWS
Load More