Companies that sponsor 401(k) plans need to consider employee demographics when deciding which types of qualified default investment alternative to offer, according to research by Manning & Napier.
A so-called QDIA is a plan that does all of the work for plan participants. These can include target-date funds, lifestyle funds or managed accounts. Participants put money into them and someone else does the work of managing the assets and diversifying the investments. As workers move closer to retirement, their investments become less risky.
Demographics are an emerging trend in the industry, says Shelby George, senior vice president of adviser services for Manning & Napier. In addition to manager selection, investment committees and plan sponsors need to address other unique plan circumstances when doing their due diligence on qualified default investment alternatives.
Also see: 3 considerations in choosing a QDIA
Target-date funds are still the QDIA of choice and they are expected to continue to grow year over year, George says. We continue to see that explosive growth in target dates. One of the ways industry has been helpful to plan sponsors is continuing to think about how we can improve target-date due diligence. That is constantly under refinement and is very beneficial to plan sponsors. A focus on demographics is a part of that.
Numerous studies have recently come out highlighting that people who have reached retirement age are not retiring. A Prudential survey in the U.K. found that one-fifth of retirees say they dont feel ready to give up working, while 51% of the people due to retire this year would consider working past state pension age. Twenty-four percent of respondents who are scheduled to retire this year have already chosen to delay their retirement.
Prudentials Class of 2015 study shows that the phased or delayed retirements that became necessary during the economic downturn have become the norm. Recent studies in the U.S. paint a similar picture.
That change in retiree mindset should be taken into consideration by employers as they pick investment options for their workplace retirement plans.
We have seen some industry interest in better understanding demographics and how they play a role in retirement planning generally, says George. When you think about auto features like automatic enrollment, part of it is in light of demographics. With TDFs there has been some discussion of glide path and what the appropriate glide path is in terms of the demographics. What we hope to see is the broader use of demographics in QDIA due diligence.
Based on a plan sponsors demographics, risk-based investments or target-date funds might be the most suitable default investment alternative, or a custom target date, traditional or pre-packaged target date fund might be a better option, she says.
We dont see as much focus on that yet. We hope to eventually, George says.
Also see: Choose TDF first, then recordkeeper
A report by Jeffrey Coons of Manning & Napier, and Fred Reish and Bruce Ashton of law firm Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, said that plan demographics go beyond participant age. Other factors that should be considered when performing due diligence on a QDIA include planned retirement age, assumed employee turnover, expected employee and employer contributions, behaviors at retirement and expected withdrawal levels.
Employers also must consider the age in which their employees began contributing to their 401(k), whether defined benefit pension benefits are also offered at the company and the likelihood of lump sum distributions, the report found.
Paula Aven Gladych is a freelance writer in Denver, Colorado.
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Employee Benefit News content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access