On July 11 when Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, announced rules for the new state health insurance exchanges, she did so with an air of caution, telling stakeholders to expect more modifications before they become final. That may prove to be an understatement.
As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), the draft proposals of the state exchanges, which are designed to be virtual marketplaces used to buy and sell insurance in each state, set standards for establishing exchanges and offer states guidance on what states should consider the exchanges’ basic functions, how to certify health plans for participation, and how to control premiums.
In a statement, Secretary Sebelius noted that state-run exchanges will share three features: they will be “one-stop shops” for consumers seeking private health insurance; they will set conditions that insurers compete only on price and quality; and they will ensure a basic level of coverage.
“Insurance companies will compete for business on a transparent, level playing field, driving down costs; and exchanges will give individuals and small businesses the same purchasing power as big businesses and a choice of plans to fit their needs," Sebelius added.
Yet, according to global consulting and actuarial firm Milliman Inc., there is still some confusion among stakeholders, who feel there are still unanswered questions about implementation.
In a report issued today, Milliman Inc. identified a series of considerations for states, health plans, and employers as they look toward the 2014 state exchange implementation deadline set forward in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and reiterated in regulations issued by Health & Human Services on July 11.
"The exchange regulations provide clarification on some points while leaving many questions open," said Cathy Murphy-Barron, Milliman principal and consulting actuary. "The possibility that exchanges could serve a larger role in the rate review process introduces questions about interaction between state insurance departments and exchanges. Perhaps most importantly from an actuarial perspective, we are still awaiting regulations on essential benefits and other key aspects of pricing, which will be pivotal in dictating the design of plans in the exchange. So while we know more today than we did last week, there are still many unknowns and various questions for states, plans, and employers to consider as they plan for the exchange paradigm."
Milliman listed the following questions that still remain unanswered:
• How firm is the deadline? Exchanges are supposed to be established by the open enrollment period that begins on October 1, 2013. However, the regulations indicate that some states could miss the 2013 deadline and then receive regular or conditional approval for an exchange in subsequent years.
• How will essential benefit regulations shake out? Many of the plan design and cost considerations that will influence the insurance policies sold through an exchange begin with the question of which benefits are offered and at what level. The exact nature of insurance policies sold through exchanges will remain vague until these regulations are introduced.
• What rating role will be played by exchanges? The exchange regulations suggest that exchanges may have a larger role in the rate review process, on top of a full review currently performed by state departments of insurance. Is there redundancy and, if so, how will that redundancy be reconciled? Yet another complexity involves methodologies used for rating individuals versus rating families. The discussion in the exchange regulations is not conclusive and leaves open a variety of different approaches that may allow flexibility or may just foment confusion.
• What about smaller insurers? The regulations indicate that health plans sold through the exchange can no longer determine their own geographic area, which introduces a new rating wrinkle. The same areas must be used within and outside of the exchanges. What should a health plan do if a state introduces a geographic area that is larger than the area served by a health plan?
• How will Federal exchanges operate? The Federal government will create an exchange for any state that does not create its own exchange by the deadline, but the Federal exchange concept remains undefined. Who will pay for Federal exchanges? Will Federal exchanges need to be financially self-sufficient, as is the case with state-run exchanges?
• What should we expect from Navigators? Navigators are entities intended to help consumers make insurance purchasing decisions in the exchange. To date, little detail on Navigators exists. The regulations help by clarifying that Navigators must be in place by the exchange's first open enrollment period on October 1, 2013. The proposed rules now require that an exchange include two types of entities as Navigators. The proposed rules ensure that a community-based or consumer-focused group will fill one of these slots. Navigators will need to demonstrate an existing relationship to consumers before appointment. Brokers and agents may act as Navigators as long as they are not receiving compensation from a qualified health plan.
• How will exchanges interact with CO-OPs? PPACA allows for the creation of Consumer Operated and Oriented Plans (CO-OPs), but details of these plans are still unclear since CO-OP regulations are still pending. CO-OPs in theory will be sold on exchanges but they have some unique requirements; how will this interaction take place? For more on CO-OPs, see this briefing paper released earlier this week.
• What does success look like? The criteria for determining the success of an exchange are still unclear. Presumably there will be milestones for measuring such criteria, but these too are undefined. The regulations also do not get into quality measurement, though quality will likely feed success criteria; forthcoming regulations will pick up on the quality topic.
According to the Milliman report, these details will need to be clarified before states can establish the proper exchange governance framework, before health plans can begin to establish their approach to rating, and before employers can make purchasing decisions. To add additional complexity, the answers to some of these questions may vary from one state to another or otherwise be influenced by local dynamics, including the existing regulatory environments in each state and geographic cost variation.
And the pressure is on: Secretary Sebelius confirmed that the Federal government will step in to establish exchanges in those states that do not implement a health insurance exchange by the 2014 deadline.
Speer reports for Insurance Networking News, a Source Media publication.
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Employee Benefit News content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access