Benefits Think Jury still out on outcomes-based incentives

Published Updated 4 Min Read

I’m going to ruffle some feathers. The bird has flown the coop. The duck is waddling out of the pond.  Why? Because I’m not fond of outcomes-based incentives. Yes, you read that correctly. I will not be jumping on the next flight out to lovely cholesterol, blood pressure, and weight-loss target land.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for promoting a healthy workplace and encouraging wellness. I’ve read scholarly publications on population health management; shook hands and enjoyed some fantastic chats with Mr. Dee Edington from the University of Michigan (very nice chap by the way); and read Total Value, Total Return: Seven Rules for Optimizing Employee Health Benefits for a Healthier and More Productive Workforce (authored by some real pros who worked with Pitney Bowes). Funny, but I don’t recall anyone recommending that I collect different premium rates for those not meeting national health guidelines.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Employee Benefit News

Sign Up Form

Login Modal Form