Benefits Think A legal opinion of ERISA threatens to ignite class action challenges to retirement plan fees

Published 5 Min Read

Pavel Danilyuk from Pexels

If you are a plan sponsor, plan administrator or plan service provider and haven’t yet heard of the Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in Bugielski v. AT&T Servs., Inc., No. 21-56196 (9th Cir. Aug. 4, 2023), consider this your wake-up call. The Ninth Circuit panel’s reinterpretation of ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules threatens to pour gasoline on the fire of speculative ERISA class actions challenging retirement plan fees.

The long and short of Bugielski is that the court found negotiation of a standard recordkeeping contract would be a prohibited transaction, unless the plan fiduciary could prove the arrangement met one of the applicable exemptions to those rules.

Ada W. Dolph
Partner

Ada W. Dolph is a partner in Seyfarth Shaw LLP's Chicago office. She defends plan fiduciaries in ERISA class actions and has extensive experience defending against claims of unreasonable retirement … Read full bio

Thomas Horan
Associate

Thomas Horan is an associate at Seyfarth Shaw LLP where he advises and defends employers in numerous industries on a range of employment and labor law matters in class actions and … Read full bio


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Employee Benefit News

Sign Up Form

Login Modal Form