Recognizing the ACA challenges posed by three-party employment arrangements

Published Updated 10 Min Read

Applicable large employers faced with the prospect of complying with the Affordable Care Act’s employer shared responsibility rules must grapple with and understand what it means to make an offer of minimum essential coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored [group health] plan to their full-time employees.

Final regulations implementing these rules determine an individual’s status as an “employee” by applying the “common law” standard, the contours of which were examined in a previous post. Identifying an employer’s common law employees in a two-party arrangement is a simple matter. But this is not always the case in three-party arrangements (i.e., those in which workers are hired from or through commercial staffing firms or professional employer organizations). Three-party arrangements invite the question—whose employee is it? Where the Act’s employer shared responsibility rules are concerned, the answer to that question tells us which entity must make the requisite offer of coverage when assessing exposure for assessable payments.

Alden J. Bianchi
Practice Group Leader

Bianchi is the practice group leader of the Mintz Levin's employee benefits & executive compensation practice, where he advises corporate, not-for-profit, governmental, and individual clients on … Read full bio

Edward A. Lenz
Senior Adviser

Lenz is a senior adviser for the employment, labor and benefits practice in Mintz Levin's Washington DC office. He is one of the nation’s leading authorities on the legal and public policy aspects of … Read full bio


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.


More From Employee Benefit News

Sign Up Form

Login Modal Form